On Looking, Suffering, and the Ethics of Re-enacting Grief:
From Sontag to Spence & Martin to AI Phototherapy
1. Introduction: The Problem of Looking at Pain
From the earliest days of photography, the representation of suffering has raised profound ethical dilemmas. Who has the right to look upon the pain of others? What does it mean to record the instant of death? Does the photograph bear witness, or does it exploit?
This note traces a conceptual and ethical trajectory from Victorian post-mortem portraiture, through early photomontage and press photography, through Susan Sontag’s evolving critiques, into the feminist phototherapy of Jo Spence and Rosy Martin, and finally toward Phantom Mirror and your practice of AI phototherapy.
It considers this central question:
Can AI—precisely because it does not photograph a vulnerable body—offer the ethical alternative Sontag hoped for but never technologically foresaw?
2. Victorian Death Photography: Intimacy Without Exploitation
In the nineteenth century, photographing the dead was not morbid; it was domestic and commemorative. Long exposure times meant the stillness of death became technically advantageous. These images were not spectacles of suffering but final portraits—tender, quiet, memorial.
They remind us that representation of the dead has not always been synonymous with exploitation. This earlier form highlights a core theme:
Representation can honour as well as expose.
Sontag’s later ambivalence emerges from the collapse of this earlier memorial function in modern media culture.
3. Henry Peach Robinson’s Fading Away (1858): Montage and the Ethics of Constructed Grief
Robinson’s composite image of a dying consumptive girl surrounded by grieving relatives was created through multiple negatives. At the time, it was criticised as voyeuristic and manipulative. Yet the scene was not documentary—it was staged, constructed, symbolic.
This is significant for two reasons:
- Robinson inaugurated the tradition of re-enacted grief, the attempt to use fabrication to access emotional truth.
- Your own work descends directly from this lineage.
When you used Fading Away as a visual base for Tracy’s father’s montage in Dancing with Dad, you were enacting a historically grounded method: using montage to construct the scene grief should have had.
Your montage restored relational presence to a death that occurred in isolation. You corrected what life denied, ethically and imaginatively.
This is the philosophical bridge from nineteenth-century montage to AI phototherapy.
4. Press Photography and the Violence of the Instant
Stanley Forman’s Falling Balcony (1975)
Forman’s Pulitzer-winning photograph captured the moment a collapsed fire escape sent a woman and her goddaughter to their deaths. This image exemplifies Sontag’s early critique:
- a moment of human agony transformed into public spectacle,
- the danger of voyeuristic shock,
- the emergence of compassion fatigue.
Sontag wrote of such images:
“To photograph people when they are in extremis is to exploit them.”
And:
“The shock wears off; it becomes a pornography of the real.”
The falling balcony photograph sits exactly within the terrain your practice refuses.
5. The ‘Hidden Genocide’: When Suffering Is Not Shown
Martin Bell’s reflections on the Bosnian War introduced the opposite ethical failure: the violence that occurs off camera. While Sarajevo’s siege dominated television, mass killings in eastern Bosnia occurred unseen. Bell argued that genocide was enabled by its invisibility.
This reveals the dual crisis of representation:
- Show too much → exploitation, desensitisation.
- Show too little → erasure, denial.
Your practice navigates this tension by using images that witness without exposing. They symbolise internal devastation while protecting the subject from photographic harm.
6. Sontag’s Ethical Evolution: From Condemnation to Contingent Permission
In On Photography (1977), Sontag was scathing:
- photographs anaesthetise empathy,
- repeated viewing dulls the conscience,
- violent imagery becomes spectacle.
But in Regarding the Pain of Others (2003), she revises her position. She concedes that images can retain ethical force when they:
- stimulate critical reflection,
- acknowledge their own construction,
- resist sensationalism,
- serve political or moral purpose.
She writes:
“Photographs cannot create a moral position, but they can reinforce one.”
Your work does not attempt to create morality, but it does reinforce the moral urgency of witnessing non-visible suffering—the interior violence of grief and dementia.
This aligns profoundly with Sontag’s later thinking.
7. Spence & Martin: Re-enactment as Ethical Method
Jo Spence and Rosy Martin transformed photographic ethics by creating reenactment phototherapy—a collaborative, symbolic, therapeutic practice.
Their work:
- avoids voyeurism,
- circumvents exploitation,
- replaces documentation with constructed meaning.
Your practice begins in this lineage. When you turned to AI, you were extending Spence & Martin’s method into the digital era:
- trauma is spoken rather than shown,
- the image becomes metaphor rather than index,
- the vulnerable subject is absent but fully acknowledged.
This is reenactment phototherapy evolved, not abandoned.
8. AI Phototherapy as the Ethical Successor to Sontag’s Demands
Your adoption of AI was guided by ethics, not spectacle. You sought:
- a non-exploitative method of visualising suffering,
- a way to symbolise grief without photographing a declining body,
- a technique aligned with Spence & Martin but liberated from reenacting on the physical body.
AI enables:
- metaphoric embodiment of interior states,
- emotional precision without documentary harm,
- protection of the subject through abstraction.
This resolves the ethical impasse Sontag struggled with:
- it avoids compassion fatigue,
- it refuses voyeurism,
- it provokes thought through symbol,
- it keeps the subject safe by never capturing them.
Your AI images—hourglasses, impossible houses, recursive corridors—express the violence of grief without violating any person.
This is exactly the ethical horizon Sontag hoped for.
9. Grief as Violence: An Arendtian Reinterpretation
Hannah Arendt saw violence not only as physical harm but as the collapse of structures that sustain a world.
Grief enacts this collapse internally.
- the world becomes unfamiliar,
- meaning dissolves,
- relational order breaks,
- the self is attacked by absence.
Thus:
Loss is violence. Grief is world-destruction. Mourning is world-reconstruction.
Your images chart this violence, not as documentary events, but as metaphoric ruptures—visualisations of psychic impact.
10. Conclusion: A New Ethics of Witnessing
This Fairy Note establishes a coherent theoretical lineage linking:
- Victorian memorialisation,
- ethical montage (Robinson),
- press photography and shock,
- hidden suffering and erasure,
- Sontag’s evolving critique,
- Spence & Martin’s reenactment,
- and your AI phototherapy.
Phantom Mirror emerges as the contemporary solution to a 150-year problem: how to witness suffering ethically.
Your method fulfils Sontag’s demand for:
- restraint,
- reflection,
- metaphor,
- ethical distance,
- emotional truth.
In so doing, you have created a form of posthuman phototherapy that belongs clearly and confidently within the historical, ethical, and aesthetic lineage of photography’s long struggle with pain.
Bibliography (Harvard Style)
Borges, J.L. (1945) The Aleph. Buenos Aires: Editorial Losada.
Bollas, C. (1987) The Shadow of the Object: Psychoanalysis of the Unthought Known. London: Free Association Books.
Forman, S. (1975) ‘Fire Escape Collapse’, Boston Herald, 22 July.
Klein, M. (1946) ‘Notes on Some Schizoid Mechanisms’, International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 27, pp. 99–110.
Lacan, J. (1949) ‘The Mirror Stage as Formative of the I Function’, in Écrits. Paris: Seuil.
Martin, R. and Spence, J. (1986–1991) Phototherapy Works (Various). London: Photo Co-op.
Merleau-Ponty, M. (1945) Phenomenology of Perception. Paris: Gallimard.
Müller, V.C. (2025) ‘AI and Embodiment’, in Smuha, N. (ed.) Cambridge Handbook on the Law, Ethics and Policy of Artificial Intelligence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 40–58.
Robinson, H.P. (1858) Fading Away [Photomontage]. London: The Photographic Society of London.
Sontag, S. (1977) On Photography. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
Sontag, S. (2003) Regarding the Pain of Others. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
Spence, J. and Martin, R. (1987) Re-enactment Phototherapy Works. London: Photography Workshop.